Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31286 (KAR)

SMT.K.T.PADMA v. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY

WP/58705/2014 · 2025-02-13

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6565 WP No. 58705 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 58705 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.K.T.PADMA W/O LATE M C PARTHASARATHY, SINCE DEACEASED BY LR YASHASVINI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, (S/O M.K. SRINIVASA IYENGAR) R/O "ABHIJIT", NO.40, KT APARTMENTS, NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, V V PURAM BANGALORE-560 004. (AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 08.06.2016) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S GANESH SHENOY, ADV.) AND: 1. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., # 927, LJ AVENUE, KANTHARAJ URS ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE-570 009 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6565 WP No. 58705 of 2014 MANDYA DIVISION, BANGALORE MYSORE ROAD, MANDYA-571 401. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED, BANGALORE ZONE, K. E. B., K. R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 009. 4. THE CONTROLLER ACCOUNTS, PENSION AND ADVANCES CORPORATE OFFICE, KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED, BANGALORE ZONE, K E B, K. R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SMT. PADMA S UTTUR, ADV. FOR R1-R4) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO RELEASE THE PENSIONARY BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONER PAYABLE TO HER UPON DEATH OF HER HUSBAND LATE M.C.PARTHASARATHY AND QUASH ANNEX-H THE COMMUNICATION DATED 22.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6565 WP No. 58705 of 2014 ORAL ORDER Sri.Ganesh Shenoy, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition and also prays for keeping open all the contentions. 2. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open all the contentions of the parties. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43