APHC010452702013 liM IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Ife AT AMARAVATI Pi a FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 440 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dt. 06.02.2013 in WP.No.16659 of 2009. Between: Shaik Mastan Vali, S/o. Kamal Saheb, aged about 56 Educatiaonalist. President of Crescent Educational Society (Regd) Block Nos. 34 & 35, Ajith Singh Nagar, R/o. 42-7, Ajith Singh Nagar, Debakotia Road, Near Sai Krupa Market, Vijayawada. years, Occ; ...Petitioner AND The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, A.P. Hyderabad. The Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise, Vijaywada, Krishna District. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. K Rama Rao, S/o. A. Atchaiah Aged about 54 years. Proprietor of Sai Srinivasa Restaurant & Bar, R/o. Door No. 42-7-7-, Block No. 36, Daba Kotia Center, Ajith Singh Nagar, Vijayawada-15, Krishna District. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents r lA NO: 1 OF 2013fWAMP 1112 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operations of the license No.4/2009-10, Dated:31-07-2009 issued by the 2nd respondent in favor of 4th respondent for conducting the bar and restaurant business in the name and style of M/S Sai Srinivasa Restaurant & Bar at the premises bearing Door No.42-7-7, Daba Kotlu Centre, Agith Singh Nagar, Vijayawada, pending disposal of Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUBHANI S M Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNC. CORP) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following order: APHC010452702013 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 440 of 2013 Shaik Mastan Vali ...Appellant Vs. The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise A.P. Hyderabad and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. Subhani S M GP for Prohibition & Excise for R.1 to R.3 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 18**’July, 2025 DATE PC : Learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter is rendered infructuous. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 • One CC to Sri Subhani S M, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3- One CC to Sri T Balaswami, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri K Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri A S C Bose (SC for Municipal Corporations), Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED; 18/07/2025 ORDER WA NO. 440 OF 2013 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS