[2025:RJ-JP:1606-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 21/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17108/2023 Chetan Chauhan S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 40 Years, Permanent Address- House No. 164/106, Sector 16, Pratap Nagar, Haldighati Marg, Dist- Jaipur, Pin-302033 ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur 3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat Jaipur. 4. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Secretariat Jaipur. 5. Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Secretariat Jaipur. 6. Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat Jaipur. 7. Joint Secretary(A-4), Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan 8. Director General Of Police, Government Of Rajasthan 9. Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range, Government Of Rajasthan 10. Superintendent Of Police, District Dholpur 11. District Collector, Dholpur 12. Additional District Collector, Dholpur 13. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Dholpur, District Dholpur 14. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dholpur 15. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, District Dholpur 16. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, District Dholpur [2025:RJ-JP:1606-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-21/2025] 17. Tehsildar, District Dholpur 18. Station House Officer, Police Thana Kotwali, District Dholpur ----Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Mathur Advocate with Mr. Paras Jain Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 10/01/2025 1. Heard. 2. The challenge to order dated 06.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge cannot be allowed to stand in this writ appeal because the learned Single Judge has not passed any order against the appellant but has only required the appellant to show cause as to why such an order may not be passed. 3. The appellant is at liberty to show cause as to why penal rent should not be charged from him. 4. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-GAURAV /8