DR JITENDRA KUMAR SAHU ALIAS JITENDRA KUMAR SAHU ALIAS JITENDRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./49/2025 · 2025-01-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31272 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31272 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 49 of 2025
------ Dr. Jitendra Kumar Sahu @ Jitendra Kumar Sahu @ Jitendra, aged about 48 years, son of Late Sukh Lal Sahu, Resident of 1/24, Rashmi Khand, Sharda Nagar, P.O. –Dilkusha, P.S. – Ashiyana, District –Lucknow, State –Uttar Pradesh; Presently residing at 15, Type V Officers Residence, CRPF Campus, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar, P.O. and P.S. –Nayapalli, District – Khurda, State –Odisha. … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
: Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 17.01.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Jadugora P.S. Case No.61 of 2024 registered under sections 75/78/ 79/351(2) & 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner intruded to the office of the informant and tried to intimidate her and pressurized her for a relationship despite being a married man. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and both the petitioner and the informant are doctors in the Central Reserve Police Force. It is then submitted that the petitioner is still in the services of Central Reserve Police Force and the petitioner and the informant are known to each other for more than seventeen years. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.50,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatshila, in connection with Jadugora P.S. Case No.61 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-