IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 540 Roshan Lal State of Punjab and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The question of law raised the action of respondent Rs.1200-2130 to the petitioner discriminatory and against the principle of natural justice. 2. Learn submissions and petitioner was rightly granted pay scale of Rs. the scale of Rs.400 Secretariat was completion of 15 years of service and had selection grade been rejected, moreover, thei also different, as also controverted by filing any replication. 3. Disposed of, reserving the in case need arises 25.03.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6242 Date of decision: ..Petitioner Versus Punjab and another ..Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) The question of law raised in para 10(i) action of respondents in not granting the 2130 to the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.1986 discriminatory and against the principle of natural justice. Learned State counsel refers to para 2 of the preliminary and states that on the recommendation of petitioner was rightly granted pay scale of Rs. the scale of Rs.400-600 and Sh. Ramji Dass, was granted pay scale of Rs.120 completion of 15 years of service and had previously selection grade of Rs.510-800 on 14.08.1982, thus, the claim of the petitioner , moreover, their qualification/experience and duty prescribed are , as also governed by separate set of rules controverted by filing any replication. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6242-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. para 10(i) of this petition is ‘whether s in not granting the same pay scale Carpenter w.e.f. 01.01.1986 is arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and against the principle of natural justice. refers to para 2 of the preliminary states that on the recommendation of 3rd Pay Commission petitioner was rightly granted pay scale of Rs.950-1800 as he was previously in ji Dass, Carpenter of Punjab Civil 00-2130 w.e.f. 03.03.1993 on his previously become eligible for grant of on 14.08.1982, thus, the claim of the petitioner qualification/experience and duty prescribed are governed by separate set of rules, which has not been petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No whether same pay scale Carpenter of , illegal, refers to para 2 of the preliminary ommission, 1800 as he was previously in Punjab Civil 2130 w.e.f. 03.03.1993 on his grant of on 14.08.1982, thus, the claim of the petitioner has qualification/experience and duty prescribed are , which has not been petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.03.26 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document