Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31270 (ORI)

SANGRAM KISHORE SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/11742/2025 · 2025-05-02

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11742 of 2025 Sangram Kishore Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. R.K. Bisoi, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Others. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No.01 ORDER 02.05.2025 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as narrated above, it is ardently prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Party No.2 to permanently absorb the petitioner under the District Ministerial cadre of Collectorate, Cuttack and extend all service and financial benefits to the petitioner from the date his immediate got such benefit under the Collectorate, Cuttack within the time stipulation as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. And/or issue any other appropriate writ/ writs, order/orders, direction/directions as deem fit and proper in the fitness of the case. And for this act of this kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-10 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-10 and take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, and communicate the result of such exercise to Petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Madhusmita