ANOOP SAHU AND 24 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/8222/2025 · 2025-05-01
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69994-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ***** (Sl No.31) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8222 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anoop Sahu And 24 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The petitioners had earlier approached this Court in Writ C No. 29772 of 2022 alongwith several other persons contending that the respondents were trying to shift them from the vending site in Sector 18, NOIDA. The said writ petition was
disposed of after recording the statement of counsel for NOIDA that the petitioners were not being removed from their present place and as and when they are removed they would be relocated at some other suitable place.
2. The operative part of the order dated 04.11.2022 of the previous writ petition is as follows:
"Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Noida states that Noida will complete the exercise of allotment of vending slots within six weeks. He further states that as and when the petitioners are removed from their present place, they will be rehabilitated at some other suitable place. Having regard to the above stand of the Noida Authority, we are of opinion that no further direction is required to be issued by this Court. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. "
3. The petitioners have filed the instant petition praying for several reliefs including allotment of a vending site to them in newly constructed vending zones.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent Authority is again trying to evict the petitioners from the vending site in Sector 18 without providing them any alternative place.
5. Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Development Authority states that the Development Authority will abide by its commitment and undertaking given in the previous writ petition and would not disposes the petitioners from their present vending site. However, the petitioner shall not carry out the vending activity over the carriage way and not block the main road nor obstruct the traffic movement on the road.
6. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent Development Authority.
Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad