2025:JHHC:28648 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 51 of 2025 Sri Vinay S. Shah, aged about 85 years, son of Shantilal Shah, resident of C-1 Gokul Building, New Ever Shin Complex, Ever Shin Nagar, Opposite Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai, P.O. & P.S. Malad (W), District Mumbai, Maharastra – 400067 presently at Gala no.14, Dumping road, Ridhi Sidhi Commercial Co- operative Society Ind. Premises, Off Link Road, Malad (West) Mumbai P.O. & P.S. Malad (W), District Mumbai, Maharastra; through his constituted power of attorney Chandan Kumar aged about 40 years resident of plot no. s- 4 city centre, sector – 4 Bokaro P.O., P.S. – Bokaro, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand 827004 … … Defendant no.1/Respondent/Appellant Versus 1. Sri Naresh Kumar Jani, S/o late Dhan Shankar Jani, resident of S-5, City Centre, Sector – 4, P.O. & P.S. Sectgor – 4, District Bokaro (Jharkhand); at present – Housing Colony, LIG 279, P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand) … … Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent 2. Shri Shri Chandra Prasad, son of late Ram Chandra Prasad, resident of Plot No.C-34, City Centre, Sector – 4, P.O. & P.S. – Sector - 4, District Bokaro, (Jharkhand) 3. The Director – in – charge, Bokaro Steel Plant, SAIL, 1st floor, Administrative Building, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro, (Jharkhand) … …Defendants/Respondents/Proforma Respondents --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Appellant : Mr. K.K. Bhatt, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Pooja Agarwal, Advocate --- 05/18.09.2025 This second appeal has been filed against the impugned judgement dated 17.05.2024 (decree sealed and signed on 30.05.2024) passed by learned Principal District Judge, Bokaro in Civil Appeal No.08/2022 whereby the judgement and decree dated 06.04.2022 (decree sealed and signed on 13.042022) passed by Civil Judge, (Sr. Div.) – I, Bokaro, in Title Suit No.87/2013 has been set aside and the appeal was disposed of. Title Suit No.87 of 2013 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) – I, Bokaro was dismissed. 2. I.A. No.13010 of 2025 has been filed by the appellant with a prayer to withdraw this second appeal. 2 3. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made. 4. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. I.A. No.10310 of 2025 is allowed. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands closed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 18.09.2025. Saurav/