[2025:RJ-JP:39587] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15142/2025 1. Anil Shrangi S/o Late Shri Mohanlal Shrangi, R/o Nahar Ka Chohatta, Pili Khana, Danmal Ka Nohra, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Amit Shrangi S/o Late Shri Mohanlal Shrangi, R/o Nahar Ka Chohatta, Pili Khana, Danmal Ka Nohra, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. 3. Shrimati Anita Shrangi D/o Late Shri Mohanlal Shrangi W/o Shri Yudhishthir, R/o House No. 4 U 1, Talvadi, Kota, Tehsil Ladpur, District Kota, Rajasthan. 4. Shrimati Anju Shrangi D/o Late Shri Mohanlal Shrangi W/o Shri Dinesh Shrangi, R/o House No. 100, Rampura Kota, Tehsil Ladpur, District Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ashish Kumar Arora S/o Late Shri Suraj Arora, R/o Pani Ki Gali, Nahar Ka Chohatta, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Kailash Chand Arora S/o Late Suraj Arora, R/o Pani Ki Gali, Nahar Ka Chohatta, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishesh Sharma Mr. Harshad Kapoor For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain Ms. Rekha Arora HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 25/09/2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with following prayers:- “1. The interim relief as prayed in Stay Application No.122/2023 filed in Appeal No.56/2023 titled Anil Shrangi and Others V/s Ashish Kumar Arora, pending [2025:RJ-JP:39587] (2 of 2) [CW-15142/2025] before the court of Additional District Judge No.1, Bundi Rajasthan be granted. 2. Respondents Defendants be further directed to restore the position of the disputed premises as the way it was at the time of passing Judgment dated 06.11.2023.” 2. After arguing at some length, counsel for the petitioners made a limited prayer that the Appellate Court may be directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 06.11.2023 at earliest. 3. Counsels appearing for the respondents submit that they have no objection if the Appellate Court is directed to decide the appeal at earliest. 4. Having regard to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners and the consent given by the counsels for the respondents and looking to the nature of dispute, the Court feels that it would be in the interest of justice of the parties to issue directions to the Appellate Court to decide the appeal at earliest. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court of Additional District Judge No.1, Bundi to decide the Appeal No. 56/2023 as early as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra /231