Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3126 (GAU)

SORUJ KUMAR SUTRADHAR v. UDDIPAK KR GOGOI AND 6 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3993/2025 · 2026-02-24

Arun Dev Choudhury

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010259052025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3993/2025 SORUJ KUMAR SUTRADHAR S/O LATE HARI CHARAN SUTRADHAR, R/O TANGLA, HOSPITAL ROAD, WARD NO. 3, DIST. UDALGURI, BTAD, ASSAM 784521 VERSUS UDDIPAK KR GOGOI AND 6 ORS S/O LATE SOMESWAR GOGOI, R/O VILL. RANGCHALI, P.O. AND P.S. BORHOOLA, JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN 785631 2:THE STATE OFASSAM REPRESENED BY THE LEGAL REMEMBRANCER CUM SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM JUDICIAL DEPTT. ASSAM SECRETARIAT GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781001 3:THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR GENERAL GUWAHATI 781001 4:THE REGISTRAR GENEAL GAUHATI HIGH COURT GUWAHATI 781001 5:THE REGISTRAR (VIGILANCE) GAUHATI HIGH COURT GUWAHATI 781001 6:THE DIST. AND SESSION JUDGE UDALGURI P.O. AND P.S. UDALGURI DIST. UDALGURI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN784509 7:THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR THE POST OF HEAD ASSTT. REPRESENTED BY DIST. AND SESSION JUDGE UDALGURI DIST. UDALGURI ASSAM 78450 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P SHARMA, S DAS,MR. N SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GHC, A J KASHYAP(R1),MR H K NATH(R1),MR S KHOUND(R1),GA, ASSAM Linked Case : CRP/0/0 SORUJ KR SUTRADHAR ASSAM VERSUS UDDIPAK KUMAR GOGOI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : SWAMAGAT SHARMA Advocate for : appearing for UDDIPAK KUMAR GOGOI BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 25-02-2026 (AD Choudhury, J) Page No.# 3/3 1. None appears for the applicant. We have heard Ms. D Mahanta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H.K. Das, learned standing counsel for the Gauhati High Court and Ms. R.B. Bora, learned Government Advocate, Assam. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of the delay of 40 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment dated 10.09.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No. 662/2025. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no instruction to object the present application. 4. Having gone through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay. 5. Accordingly, the delay of 40 days in preferring the appeal is condoned and the Interlocutory Application stands allowed and disposed off. 6. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect-free, shall list the same under appropriate heading, preferably on 27.04.2026. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant