Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31252 (AP)

The Harsha Parishudhya Karmika Sangham v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.

WP/39586/2014 · 2025-03-18

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010458102014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 39586 OF Between: The Harsha Parishudhya Karmika Sangham and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 39586 OF 2014 The Harsha Parishudhya Karmika Sangham and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 39586 OF 2014 The present Writ Petition is filed declaring the Paper Notification dated 01.12.2014 punished in Sakshi Telugu Newspaper as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the directions of this Court and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondent No.2 to receive the Tenders as per the amended Tender Notification punished vide Roc.No.4158/2014/F-1, dated 13.11.2014. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court, in view of passage of time and changed circumstances. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 18.03.2025 KK