Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31242 (BOM)

JALINDAR BHAUSAHEB ARGADE v. MAYUR VINAYAK KSHIRSAGAR AND ORS

CA/12413/2024 · 2025-01-30

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 55ca12413.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12413 OF 2024 IN FAST/30104/2024 JALINDAR BHAUSAHEB ARGADE VERSUS MAYUR VINAYAK KSHIRSAGAR AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Wagh Umakant U. Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Deshmukh Mohit R. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 30.01.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard, learned Advocate appearing for applicant. 2. Applicant seeks to condone delay of 159 days caused in filing appeal. 3. Perusal of application suggests that due to financial difficulties applicant could not file appeal within stipulated period. Considering submission advanced and the reasons 2 55ca12413.24 stated in application, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence application succeeds. Delay of 159 days caused in filing appeal stands condoned. Appeal be registered subject removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE mahajansb/