Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31241 (AP)

VANKADARI KRISHNA MURTHY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23978/2025 · 2025-09-09

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ \ APHC010456872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0?? WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23978 OF 2025 Between: Vankadari Krishna Murthy, S/o Vankadhara Kondaiah, Aged About 59 years, Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Kurnool District. ‘ ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The District Collector, Nandyal District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. The Tahsildar, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District. The Sub-Registrar, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in-action on the part of the 2nd respondent in dispose of the application of the petitioner filed through E-seva vide Application No. TTA012500127221 dated 12-02-2025 for deleting the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitory list as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 300-A of the constitution consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider and application of the petitioner filed TTAO 12500127221 deleting the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitory list. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner filed through the E-Seva application No. TTA012500127221 dated 12-02-2025 for deleting the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitory list pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALLU HARI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following order: of India and dispose of the dated 12-02-2025 for APHC010456872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] I WEDNESDAY.THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23978/2025 Between: 1.VANKADARI KRISHNA MURTHY, S/0 VANKADHARA KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, ITIKALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL DISTRICT. REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, NANDYAL 5.THE SUBREGISTRAR, , NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the in-action on the part of the 2nd respondent in dispose of the application of the petitionerfiled through E-seva vide Application No. TTA012500127221 dated 12- 02-2025 for deleting the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitorylist as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner filed TTAO 12500127221 dated 12-02-2025 for deleting the petitioners land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitory list and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner filed through therE-Seva application No. TTA012500127221 dated 12-02-2025 for 2 # deleting the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac.4.338 cents in Sy.No. 671 situated at Itikala Village, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibitory list pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ALLU HARI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ? GP FOR RFGiSTRATinM AMD c^TAMP.q 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23978 of 2025 ORDER:- Pithily, this writ petition is filed on the ground that application bearing No TTA012500127221 dated 12.02.2025, was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the application, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. 2. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh^ held as follows: “...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” 3. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities. before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue. If it is with reference to a "dead or "stale" issue or dispute, the \ Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct ^ (2019) 15 see 613 4 consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not exoresslv sav so. that would ho tho lonol nn^itinn onH " ‘ ' ' ' ^ ^ , W. 4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 5. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioner’s application bearing N0.TTAOI2500127221 dated 12.02.2025, be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/’ B. PRASADA RAO assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Nandyal District. 3. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kolimigundia Mandal, Nandyal District. 5. The Sub-Registrar, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 6. One CC to Sri. Allu Hah Narayana Advocate [OPUC] 7. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Q i vvw LU iOl I oiiui I aiio OLCiiiipo, I»*+ /-\-f C KJI ro / \i iOl II C4 v^. Pradesh [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:10/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23978 OF 2025 OF S 22 SEP 2025 m «o C> ^ Current Seclion DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS