Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1986 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UCLCON/73/2025 UHon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that decision on petitioner’s representation has been taken vide order dated
05.03.2025. Copy of said order has been produced in Court, which is taken on record.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Competent Authority to take decision was Registrar but the decision has been taken by Sub-Registrar.
4. Be that as it may, since representation has been decided, therefore, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order before appropriate forum.
5. With the said observations, the contempt petition is disposed of.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 20.03.2025 Mahinder/