APHC010457602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 23275/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK YADULLA, S/O SHAIK AMEEN PEER, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC SELF-EMPLOYED, R/O 16-2-33, ISLAMPET, 30TH WARD, BAPATIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. -522101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR RANGE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SP COMPOUND, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAPATLA TOWN POLICE STATION, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAPATLA TOWN POLICE STATION, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 7. SHAH SAHIL ALI, S/O HAMID ALI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC NOT KNOWN,R/O VRINDAVANCHAWL, ROOM NO. 3, NEW LINK 2 ROAD, KAJUPADA, BEHRAMBAUG, JOGESHWARI (WEST), MUMBAI 400102. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an order, writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and upon a comprehensive inquiry into the matter Respondents No.s 3 to 6 to perform the following direct the A) To direct them forthwith to produce the petitioners daughter Shaik Umera Fathima from the illegal custody of the 7th Respondent and his family before this Honble Court B) To direct that the detainee be placed under the protective custody of the Child Welfare Commission Or Women Welfare Commission to ensure her immediate safety and provide treatment for her physical and psychological well-being and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Both the petitioner as well as the alleged detenue are physically present before this Court. 2. We have also interacted with the alleged detenue. She stated that she had gone to Mumbai on her own freewill and she is desirous of going back to Mumbai to stay with her husband and his family. She has further stated that she wishes to spend some time with her parents before going back to Mumbai. 3. In the circumstances, nothing further remains, in the present Writ Petition and it is closed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 15.09.2025 BSM 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.23275 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao) 15-09-2025 BSM