Munshi Ram vs. Madan Singh and Anr. RSA No. 237 of 2024 24.09.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sood, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP No. 5068 of 2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the pleadings. Before the trial Court, a specific issue, i.e., issue No. 5 was framed in the following manner:- Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of permanent prohibitory injunction, as prayed for? OPP. In this respect, a categorical finding was returned by the trial Court that the possession of the suit property was not of the present respondent/plaintiff/non- applicant in the case at hand. In view thereof, let status quo qua possession, ownership and revenue entries be maintained during the pendency of the present proceedings, subject to modification by moving appropriate application. Application stands disposed of. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge September 24th, 2025. (Susheel)