APHC010457302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23973/2025 Between: 1. PASUPULETI MUNEMMA, W/O BATHINAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O RAJULA KANDRIGA H/O MADIBAKA VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. PASUPULETI HARIHARAN, S/O BATHINAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O RAJULA KANDRIGA H/O MADIBAKA VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , YERPEDU, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YERPEDU, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. 5. SAKAMURI DINAKAR NAIDU, S/O BATHI NAIDU HINDU, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O MUSALLPADU VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4TH respondents in pressurizing the Petitioner not to enter into the Agriculture land and interfering into the civil disputes at the instance of 5th Respondent in insisting to handover the Schedule agriculture Land to the respondent and interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner without any legal cause as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to forbear from interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members not to interfere with the civil disputes and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3RD Respondents not to pressurize the Petitioner by summoning to the police station and not to enter into the agriculture land of the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23973 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in pressurizing the Petitioner not to enter into the Agriculture land and interfering into the civil disputes at the instance of 5th Respondent in insisting to handover the Schedule agriculture Land to the respondent and interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner without any legal cause as illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to forbear from interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members not to interfere with the civil disputes and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri N.Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are calling the petitioners to the police station without there being any crime registered against them and also they are interfering with the civil disputes between them and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioners to the police station since no crime has been registered against them and also not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. Further, in case, a crime is registered against the petitioners, police are directed to follow due process according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS