APHC010457852011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16834/2011 Between: 1. G.SUNEETHA, D/O.G.VENKATARAMULU, UNEMPLOYEE R/O 8-92, NEAR MRO OFFICE, TALUPULA VILLAGE & MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE NEW DELHI, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION NEW DELHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI. 4. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATTION (SE.GENL.II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 5. THE DIRECTOR, A.P. TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, O/o COMMISSIONER & DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD - 500 004. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Clause 10 of G.O.Ms.No.51 School Education (Se.Genl.II) Department, dated 16.4.2011, whereby "proposed to provide 20% weightage to TET scores in the Teacher Recruitment of the State Government" as illegal, arbitrary and Contrary to Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the Rules and Regulations of the National Council for Teacher Education and contrary to the Education Act and violation of Article 21 of the 2 Constitution of India, and consequently strick down the said Clause from the above G.O. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. -- 3. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH 4. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16834 of 2011 ORDER: Mr.V.Jagadeesh, learned counsel representing Mr.Narasimhulu Parise, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, it has become infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle. In view of the said representation, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 27.06.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.16834 of 2011 Date : 27.06.2025 SPP