Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31230 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/521/2025 · 2025-03-19

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40628 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 521 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nasrin,Rakesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to conclude the proceedings of Case No. 27 of 2024, under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, P.S.- Sikanderpur, District- Ballia, pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.), F.T.C.-III, Ballia expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that summoning order in the matter was passed on 27.11.2024 and the opposite party no.2 was summoned to face trial under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial is pending at the stage of appearance and only dates are being fixed. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest to decide the said case. Applicant in this case has suffered monetary loss. The accused is not cooperating with the case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It appears from perusal of the record that the matter is pending at the stage of appearance of opposite party no.2 and the main cause of delay appears due to the negligence of the complainant himself, who is not taking any steps as directed by the trial Court. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case provided the present applicant/ complainant makes compliance of the orders of the Court and gives all his assistance and support to the trial Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad