1 2025:CGHC:29848 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 539 of 2021 1 - Mangal Singh S/o Manau Ram Uraon Aged About 76 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Botalda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Ashok Kumar S/o Gyanu Ram Uraon Aged About 40 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Botalda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Bharat Lal S/o Ganpat Ram Rathia Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Bansmuda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Heera Lal S/o Ganpat Ram Rathia Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Bansmuda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Yogendra S/o Ganpat Ram Rathia Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Bansmuda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Hara Bai D/o Ganpat Ram Rathia Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Bansmuda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Ramoti Bai Wd/o Ganpat Ram Rathia Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Bansmuda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Shankar Lal S/o Manau Ram Uraon Aged About 58 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Botalda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Ankar Lal S/o Manau Ram Uraon Aged About 58 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Botalda, Tahsil Kharisa, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Rajat Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, P.L. SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 02.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the plaintiff/ respondent No.1 filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction alongwith an application for temporary injunction. He would submit that the learned trial Court allowed the application for temporary injunction vide order dated 16.12.2020 and the said order was affirmed by the learned Appellate Court in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2021, vide order dated 5.8.2021. He would submit that the suit is currently fixed for defendants’ evidence before the learned trial Court, and therefore, a direction may be issued to the said Court to conclude the proceedings of pending civil suit expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to make all endeavours to conclude the proceedings of Civil Suit No.61-A of 2020 expeditiously. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi