Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31226 (ALL)

KHALIDA KHATOON v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/9499/2025 · 2025-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:45731 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9499 of 2025 Applicant :- Khalida Khatoon Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ganesh Shanker Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence the prayer has been wrongly mentioned. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the same during the course of hearing. Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Kumar Rai, brief holder for the State. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 4564 of 2000 (State Vs. Jayanti Prasad and others), under Sections 147, 341, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Mohana, District Siddharth Nagar, whereby non-bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the time of issuing non-bailable warrants the applicant was on bail. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for appearance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant direct NBW has been issued. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 528 of B.N.S.S is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appear before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Ishan Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad