919 CA 3339-2022, 920, 922 to 925, 927 to 929 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3339 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32527 OF 2019 PANDURANG SHYAMRAO BANBARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicant Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.P. Narwade – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3340 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32521 OF 2019 BALAJI NAMDEV DAPKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicants Mr. D.J. Patil – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.P. Narwade – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3342 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32483 OF 2019 BALAJI MAROTI BANBARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicant Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.P. Narwade – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 1/4 2025:BHC-AUG:5568 919 CA 3339-2022, 920, 922 to 925, 927 to 929 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3343 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32517 OF 2019 CHANDAR PUNDLIKRAO KOTHARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.J. Patil – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.P. Narwade – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3346 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32514 OF 2019 DIPAK BALAJI KOTHARE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. AND 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3349 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32504 OF 2019 HANMANT RAJARAM BANBARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicant Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. AND 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3392 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32493 OF 2019 DADARAO PUNDLIK BANBARE AND ANOTHER VERSUS 2/4 919 CA 3339-2022, 920, 922 to 925, 927 to 929 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. AND 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3393 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32489 OF 2019 MADHAV BAPURAO BANBARE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicants Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.P. Narwade – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3394 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32486 OF 2019 VISHWAMBAR PUNDA DAPKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicants Mr. D.J. Patil – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATE : 27.02.2025 PER COURT : 1. Heard rival submissions. 2. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay 3/4 919 CA 3339-2022, 920, 922 to 925, 927 to 929 periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3. Learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for acquiring body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. However all the delay periods in these applications are below 100 days and therefore, considering the short periods of delay the same stand condoned. 4. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. 5. The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale 4/4