Badana Venkata Ramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/23961/2025 · 2025-09-22
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31218 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31218 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010456662025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 23961 OF 2025
Between:
1. Badana Venkata Ramana, S/o.Swamy Babu, Aged about 54 years, Occ- Private Employee, Main Street, Kammavaripeta, Ponnada Village Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, B.C Welfare Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi
3. The Deputy Director, B.C Welfare Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada, NTR District, A.P.
4. The District Collector, Collectorate compound, Srikakulam District Bapatia District. 5. The District B C Welfare officer, Srikakulam District,
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs) to the son of the petitioner by name
SRK, J W.P.No.23961 of 2025
2 Badana Naveen Kumar under the scheme of NTR VIDESHI VIDYA DARANA Overseas scholarship Application ID No. OV2018119443, which is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 19, of Constitution of India and principles of Natural Justice, and consequently direct the respondents to release the sanctioned funds. Counsel for the Petitioner: SOURI BABU DUPPATI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
SRK, J W.P.No.23961 of 2025
3 The Court made the following ORDER:
Grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition, is that despite sanction of funds by the Government, the respondents are not releasing the financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- to his son namely Badana Naveen Kumar under the „Videshi Vidyadharana Overseas Scholarship Scheme‟ in pursuance of the application bearing ID No.OV2018119443, for studying MBBS Course in Lyceum North Western University, Philippines. 2.
2. Today, when the matter came up for admission, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and acceded to, by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.28790 of 2023, dated 02.11.2023, wherein this Court held thus. “3. While making the above submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner had also drawn the attention of this Court to the order of a learned Judge of this Court in W.P.No.21305 of 2023, dated 29.8.2023. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, on the basis of the communication dated 02.11.2023 addressed by the 3rd respondent, made his submissions. 4. As seen from the said communication, which is made part of the record, it is discernible that there is no dispute with regard to the
SRK, J W.P.No.23961 of 2025
4 petitioner‟s son pursuing Post Graduation Course of Masters in Information Technology and Systems from the University of Tasmania, Australia. It would further appear that the verification of documents was completed and the petitioner‟s son is eligible for financial assistance, in view of the report submitted by the Vigilance and Enforcement Department. But it takes three months‟ time for completing the process of making payment of the amount (for receipt of budget from the Government and for sanction of the amount). 5. This Court, considering the submissions made and the object of the Government in issuing the above referred Government Orders, is of the opinion that any unreasonable delay on the part of the respondent Authorities, is not just or tenable more particularly in the light of the averments made in Paragraph No.8 of the writ affidavit and results in irreparable prejudice to the petitioner. The grievance of the writ petitioner is well founded.”
3. Hence, following the said order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.28790 of 2023, dated 02.11.2023 and for the reasons mentioned therein, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to release the financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) to the son of the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of
SRK, J W.P.No.23961 of 2025
5 receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:23.09.2025 Nsr
SRK, J W.P.No.23961 of 2025
6 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Writ Petition No.23961 of 2025
Date:23.09.2025
Nsr