- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19565 WP No. 19911 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 19911 OF 2022 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: DR. SYAMALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS SHYAMALA REDDY DENTAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE NO.111/1, SGR COLLEGE MAIN ROAD MUNNEKOLALA MARATHAHALLI POST BANGALORE-560037 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON DR SYAMALA REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY DR. SHYAMALA REDDY.- (ABSENT) AND: 1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DENTAL EDUCATION SECTION) REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NIRMAN BHAVAN NEW DELHI-110011. 2. DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA A STATUTORY BODY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE DENTIST ACT, 1948 AIWAN-E-GHALIB MARG Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19565 WP No. 19911 of 2022 KOTLA ROAD NEW DELHI-110002. 3. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES KARNATAKA 4TH T BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560041 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE VIKAS SOUDHA DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MEDICAL EDUCATION). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHETHAN A C., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. ADITYA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.09.2022 PASSED BY THE R2 IN NO.V.12017/122/2022-DE WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION; SET ASIDE THE COMMUNICATION DATED 16.09.2022 ISSUED BY THE R1 TO THE R4 IN NO.V.12017/122/2022-DE WHICH IS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19565 WP No. 19911 of 2022 PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-J TO THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner, and as requested by the learned counsels for the respondents, this Court's order dated 16.12.2024 is perused. This Court must observe that the petitioner has not made any alternative arrangement despite opportunity. Hence, the petition is rejected. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA ct:sr