APHC010455892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23542/2024 Between: BAYYANNAGARI GOPAL, S/O. B.BAYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,GUDURUPALLE VILLAGE, MEMBER IN Z. P. HIGH SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE PUNGANURMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THETAHSILDAR, PUNGANUR MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE PANCHAYATI SECRETARY, GUNDISIBANDA PANCHAYATHI, PUNGANUR MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. O KIRAN KUMAR, , S/O.PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, PADMAJA-BOOK SHOP THERU STREET,PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. B AANJAPPA, S/O. BAYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, GUDURUPALLE VILLAGE, PUNGANURMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. G SASIKUMAR, S/O. LATE PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,KONDASAMUDRAM VILLAGE PUNGANURMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. T MOHAN, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, KONDASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. RESPOND ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 7 for not taking the action on the complaint dated 24-09-2024 and representations dated 25-09-2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the representation dated 24.09.2024 given by the Petitioner, the Police enquired into the matter and found that the subject matter is pending before the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Punganur vide O.S.No.323 of 2008. It is further submitted that the matter is purely related to civil issues and as such, the Respondent – Police has not registered the case based on the complaint of the Petitioner. 3. Dr.G.V.Ravi, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23542 of 2024 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh