Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 312 (CHH)

BALESHWAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/556/2025 · 2026-04-12

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 556 of 2025 1 - Baleshwar Sahu Son of Shri Teras Ram Sahu Aged About 37 Years Resident of House No.228, Bajrang Mohalla 1, Sarwani District- Janngir- Champa (C.G.) 2 - Gautam Rathore Son of Shri Ram Narayan Rathore Aged About 46 Years Resident Of H.No. 133, Fandahi Mohalla, Champa Kosmanda District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Police Station Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Rajkumar Sharma Son of Shri Dhiraj Sharma Aged About 49 Years Resident Of Main Road, Lakhli Sarwani (Paraspali) Ps And Tahsil Saragaon, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate. For State : Shri Praveen Das, Addl. Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 : Shri Ravindra Sharma, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 13.04.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1 The petitioners have filed this petition seeking following reliefs: INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.04.15 10:20:50 +0530 2 “a. A writ and/or an order in the nature of mandamus do issue calling for records pertaining to case of petitioner from respondent concerned including the record of revenue authorities, as detailed in writ petition, for perusal of this Hon'ble Court, if deem fit. b. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing FIR No.0450/2025 dated 03.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station Champa, District Janjgir Champa by respondent No.1 against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code in the peculiar factual matrix of the case.” 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition as charges have been framed and evidence of prosecution witnesses are commenced. 3 Leaned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that in the present writ petition the petitioners have enclosed original cheque No.978121, dated 04.11.2025 of State Bank of India, amounting to Rs.10,00,000/- for the progress of compromise in the matter, which may kindly be directed to return to the petitioners. 4 In view of above submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to return original cheque No.78121, dated 04.11.2025 of State Bank of India, amounting to Rs.10,00,000/- to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder