SMT. SANDHYA KHARE W/O SH. D.K. KHARE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/922/2024 · 2025-02-06
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31197 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31197 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5371-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 922/2024
1. Smt. Sandhya Khare W/o Sh. D.k. Khare, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 4-Ma-40, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur
2. Sh. Dau Dayal S/o Sh. Kamal Niwas, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 55, Durga Vihar A, Jaisa Bohra, Jhotwara, Jaipur
3. Sh. Durgesh Sharma W/o Sh. Gyanesh Prakash Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 10/582, Kaveri Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur
4. Sh. Jagdish Narayan S/o Sh. Kalyan Singh Sahay, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B-84, Phase-Iii, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur
5. Sh. Kailash Gurjar S/o Sh. Roop Narayan Gurjar, Aged About 61 Years, R/o A-21, Dundla House, Nandpuri, 22- Godam, Jaipur
6. Smt. Kalpana Patil W/o Sh. Shrikant Patil, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 13/120, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur
7. Smt. Kamal Sharma W/o Sh. Om Prakash Sharma, Aged About 66 Years, R/o B-10-F, Flat No. 300-301, Above Surbhi Beauty Parlour, Govind Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur
8. Smt. Kawal Jeet Kaur W/o Sh. Trilochan Singh Kapoor, Aged About 65 Years, R/o 319, Near Sewa Sadan, D- Block, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur
9. Smt. Anita Gandhi S/o Sh. Arun Gandhi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 73-A, Taneja Block, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur
10. Smt. Sudesh Khurana W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 24/97, Swarna Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur
11. Smt. Sumita Gupta W/o Sh. Prakash Garg, Aged About 64 Years, R/o 4/357, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur
12. Smt. Usha Shekhawat W/o Sh. Veer Bahadur Singh Rathore, Aged About 54 Years, R/o C-124-A, Singh Bhoomi, Khatipura, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary Shri Krishna Kunal, Department Of School Education And
[2025:RJ-JP:5371-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-922/2024] Language, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Sh. Ashish Modi, Director Of Secondary Education, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan
3. Jasweer Singh, Secretary Of Managing Committee, Guru Nanak Dev Senior Secondary School, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary Jas ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nishita Gambhir for Mr. Javed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh Mr. Devendra Sharma Mr. Ntiesh Pareek HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 06/02/2025
1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. 3.
The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioners shall also be examined in terms of an order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:-
“1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus
[2025:RJ-JP:5371-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-922/2024] Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.”
4.
All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of College Education as also the private school education officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Commissionerate of College Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Gaurav/41