Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31193 (AP)

Budamaguntia Gopi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23395/2024 · 2025-07-16

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010456472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23395/2024 Between: 1. BUDAMAGUNTIA GOPI, S/O. LATE BUDAMAGUNTIA CHENGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. 2-17, UPPARAPALEM, SETTIPALLI, TIRUPATI (URBAN), TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517506. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTHI DIVISIONAL OFFICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 5th respondent not restoring the name of the petitioner and the particulars of land of an extent of Ac.9.96cents in Sy. No. 554 of Erramareddypalem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District inspite of the proceedings issued by the respondents No. 1 to 3 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide intentional and consequently direct the 5threspondent to take up the matter and restore the name and particulars of the petitioner land of an extent of Ac.9.96cents in Sy. No. 554 of Erramareddypalem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District in the web land in pursuance of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent CCLA. REF. No. SETT.II (2)/49/2020, dated 10.03.2020 in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to restore the entries in web land by considering the orders issued by the 3'^'^ respondent ROC. No. H5/251/18, dated 21.01.2019 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 17.10.2024 in WP.No.23395 of 2024 and to dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of the letter dated 15.07.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 17.07.2025 TVN 323 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.23395 OF 2024 Date : 17.07.2025 TVN