247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12247-2025 Date of decision: 04.04.2025 Sandeep Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Yuwan Singla, Advocate and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.336 dated 27.09.2024 under Sections 406/420 of IPC (Sections 467/468/471 of IPC have been added later on by the Investigating Agency) registered at Police Station Civil Line Jind, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure P-4). 2. On 05.03.2025, the following order was passed:- “This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.336 dated 27.09.2024 under Sections 406/420 of IPC (Sections 467/468/471 of IPC have been added later on by the Investigating Agency) registered at Police Station Civil Line Jind, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure P-4). Notice of motion for 04.04.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Yuwan Singla, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney and admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and Neha 2025.04.04 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-12247-2025 -2- also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. ” 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.336 dated 27.09.2024 under Sections 406/420 of IPC (Sections 467/468/471 of IPC have been added later on by the Investigating Agency) registered at Police Station Civil Line Jind, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 04.04.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.04.04 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document