IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24286 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- Madhusudanpur District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Pintu Yadav S/O Vijay Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur 2. Laddu Yadav @ Laddu Kumar S/O Vijay Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur 3. Bipin Yadav @ Chitranjan Yadav S/O Arjun Yadav @ Arun Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur 4. Bijay Yadav S/O Buggi Yadav @ Bugli Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur 5. Indra Yadav @ Indra Kumar Yadav S/O Late Anandi Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur 6. Arun Yadav S/O Late Saryou Yadav @ Saryoug Yadav R/O vill.- Bhatoriya, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 151(2), 190, 126(2), 109, 74, 354(4), 354(5), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dayan Act. 3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners are alleged to have assaulted informant and others. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24286 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are neighbors and there is admitted land dispute between the parties due to which simple maar-peet took place. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class VII, Bhagalpur in connection with Madhusudanpur P.S. Case No. 10 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24286 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 3/3 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T