[2025:JHHC:26222] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No.119 of 2025 ------ Aditya Sekhar, aged about 36 years, S/o Sri Padumanabhan Sekhar R/o G-03/04, Cyprus CHS, Adhiraj Gardens, Plot No.132, Sector-05, Kharghar, Maharastra-410210, P.O. + P.S.-Kharghar, Dist.-Raigarh, State-Maharastra, India .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Sachin Kumar, Coordinator-Information Management System, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Shyamali Colony Ranchi, P.O. + P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P Mr. Krishna Kumari, Advocate Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate ------ Order No.05 Dated- 29-08-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.12.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.12.2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner was directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp report within four weeks from the date of that order but the said defects could not be removed during the stipulated time as the Hon’ble Court was closed on account of winter vacation during the period and after reopening, due to miscalculation of the peremptory time for filing the enclosure of F.I.R.; the same could not be filed by the petitioner, which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.12.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2230 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after two weeks. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/