Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31184 (KAR)

SRI RAJANNA N v. SRI J N GURAPPA REDDY

CRL.RP/1372/2016 · 2025-04-03

Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14002 CRL.RP No. 1372 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1372 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI. RAJANNA N PROPRIETOR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS M/S SAGAR AUTO CONSULTANTS NO.374,2ND STAGE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJU S.G, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. J.N GURAPPA REDDY S/O NARAYANASWAMY REDDY, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO.21/2, JARAGANAHALLI, RAJIV GANDHI ROAD CROSS, J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 010. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J., BANGALORE (CCH-68) IN CRL.A.NO.821/2016 DATED 14.10.2016 BY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETR. AND THE ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE XXII ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.4580/2016 DATED 21.06.2016 AND THE PETR. MAY BE ACQUITTED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT IN Digitally signed by HARIKRISHNA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14002 CRL.RP No. 1372 of 2016 C.C.NO.4580/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ACMM, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent since 09.01.2024. This Court issued Court notice to the parties to prosecute this case on 09.01.2024. Subsequently, the jurisdictional police submitted a report stating that respondent died on 14.05.2022 along with the death certificate of the respondent. As such, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to take necessary steps to bring the legal representatives of the respondent within two weeks. However, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the said order. Thereafter, on 18.02.2025, this Court granted a week's time as a last chance. 2. Despite granting sufficient opportunities, today also learned counsel for the revision petitioner remained absent. This revision petition is of the year 2016. It could be gathered that learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not interested - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14002 CRL.RP No. 1372 of 2016 to prosecute this revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2