Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3117 (GAU)

Takok Mra v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

WP(C)/607/2025 · 2026-02-08

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040021052025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/607/2025 Takok Mra Son of Shri Tai Mra, resident of Gelemo Village, PO Lemeking, PS Nacho, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Union of India and 5 Ors represented by the Ministry of Defense, Govt of India, Mo D New Delhi. 2:The Director General Defense Estate Defense Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Raksha Sampada Bhawan Ulaan Baatar Marg Delhi Cantt 110010 3:The Defese Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Commanding Officer Age: 0 Occupation : 340 Field Regiment (Army) Gelemo Post Lemeking Circle Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Officer in Charge 237 Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 Engineer Regiment of Indian army Gelemo Post. 6:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Daporijo District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Wanglat Khomrang,Biri Esther,Tadar Bai,Tachung Nalo,Nannu Yubi,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,K Gara,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, CGC,KeekeLoya,GA (AP),DSGI BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI 09.02.2026 Heard Ms. T. Rimi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri K. Loya, learned CGC representing respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and Ms. T. Basar, learned State counsel representing State respondent No.6. Considering the subject matter and also taking into consideration the written instruction placed on record by the learned CGC, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. Suffice it to mention that this matter was taken up for consideration on 3 (three) previous occasions when directions were given to the learned CGC to obtain the necessary instructions. The primary grievance raised in this writ petition is with regard to non-consideration of a representation which has been stated to be Page No.# 3/3 submitted on 18.03.2025. The said representation was with regard to the acquisition of 19 acres of land for the establishment of 340 Field Regiment at Gelemo under the Limeking Circle of the Uppper Subansiri District of the State. As mentioned above, directions were issued by this Court to the learned CGC to obtain instruction on the fate of the representation. Shri Loya, learned CGC, has placed on record, copy of the written instruction dated 09.02.2026 as per which the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of. The order of such disposal, however, has not been enclosed to the written instructions. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the respondents to communicate the order by which the representation was disposed of, so that, the petitioner, if aggrieved can make a fresh challenge. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Copy of the written instruction dated 09.02.2026 is made part of the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant