[2025:RJ-JP:25159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15698/2024 Ranjeet Kumar S/o Shri Ajay Kumar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Anah, Post Sewar, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Mr. Rohit Tiwari for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/07/2025 1. Counsel for petitioner, verbally, raised an issue that Question No.24 of Paper IV (Subject General Hindi & General English) of RAS Mains Examination, was not checked by the examiner, however, while reading out Para Nos.11 & 12 of the writ petition, it has transpired that petitioner has not pleaded such issue, rather has pleaded that proper marks for the answer of Question No.24 has not been given. 2. Counsel for respondent- RPSC pointed out that the copies were checked by the subject experts and petitioner was assigned two marks for Question No.24. In addition, counsel submits that re-examination of answer sheets are not permitted under Rule 18 of Rajasthan State & Subordinate Services (Direct Recruitment by [2025:RJ-JP:25159] (2 of 2) [CW-15698/2024] Combined Competitive Examination) Rules, 1999. Further, it has transpired that pursuant to same recruitment process, petitioner has been selected and is presently posted as Excise Inspector. 3. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time and having instructions from petitioner, does not want to pursue the writ petition on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/288