APHC010450552019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15 OF 2020 Between: Shreya Corporation, Survey No, 222, Near Chakripuram Junction Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500062. Rep. by its Proprietor. A: Bramaramba, D/o Sarya Vara Prasada Rao, Indian, Business, Survey No. 222, Near Chakripuram Junction Aged about 45 years, Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500062 ...Petitioner AND 1. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, APIIC Towers Rep. by Plot No. 1, IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Pin. 522503. 2. The Zonal Manager, APIIC Limited Industrial Park, M.G. Road (Autonagar), Vijayawada-520007, Krishna District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Industries Infrastructure and Investment, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. PrI. Secretary to Govt., ...Respondents of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may 4 be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by A. declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent vide Lr. No. 22755/APIIC/M IP/MALLAVALLIA/JA/2018/P. NO. 18/94&18/95, DT. 12-12- 2019 by cancelling the allotment made to the petitioner by forfeiting the EMD paid with the application and further directing that the amount deposited shall be refunded as per Allotment Regulations without considering the representations of the petitioner dt. 17-05-2019, 27-08-2019 and 11-09-2019 as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the letter and spirit of the Regulations framed by the 1st respondent and also violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and consequentially set aside the impugned proceedings dt. 12-12-2019 issued by the 2nd respondent. B) declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent vide Lr. No. 22755/APIIC/M IP/MALLAVALLIA/JA/2018/P. NO. 18/94 and 18/95, DT. 12- 12-2019 by cancelling the allotment made to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the article 14 and 19 of the constitution of the India and consequentially direct the respondents to execute and register the sale agreement in favour of the petitioner by complying the terms and conditions of the Allotment order. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend proceedings vide Lr. No. 22755/APIIC/M IP/MALLAVALLI/VJA/2018/P. NO. 18/94 and 18/95, DT. 12-12-2019 issued by 2nd respondent pending final disposal of the above writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Between: 1. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, , Rep. by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, APIIC Towers, Plot No. 1, IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Pin. 522503. 2. The Zonal Manager, APIIC Limited, Industrial Park, M.G. Road (Autonagar), Vijayawada-520007. ...Petitioners/ Respondents AND 1. Shreya Corporation, Survey No. 222, Near Chakripuram Junction, Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500062. Rep. by its Proprietor. A. Bramaramba, D/o Sarya Vara Prasada Rao, Indian, Aged about 45 years. Business, Survey No. 222, Near Chakripuram Junction, Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500062 ... Respondent/Petitioner 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary to Govt., Industries Infrastructure and Investment, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. ...Respondents/ Respondent No.3 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 07.01.2020 passed in W.P No. 15 of 2020. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARUTURI HEMA BINDHU Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: SRI J UGRANARASIMHA The Court made the following order: COMMERCE APHC010450552019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) •I [3331] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15/2020 Between: 1.SHREYA CORPORATION, , CHAKRIPURAM JUNCTION, DISTRICT, HYDERABAD-500062. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR. A. BRAMARAMBA, D/0 SARYA VARA PRASADA RAO, INDIAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUSINESS, SURVEY NO. 222, NEAR. CHAKRIPURAM JUNCTION, GHATKESAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, HYDERABAD-500062 SURVEY NO. 222, NEAR. GHATKESAR, RANGA REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, , REP. BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APIIC TOWERS, PLOT NO. 1, IT PARK, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN. 522503. INDUSTRIAL 2.THE ZONAL MANAGER, APIIC LIMITED, INDUSTRIAL PARK, M.G. ROAD (AUTONAGAR), VIJAYAWADA-520007, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., INDUSTRIES INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. PRL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be m pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, G. aer or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by A.declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent vide Lr. No. 22755/APIIC/M IP/MALLAVALLINJA/2 018/P. NO. 18/94 and 18/95, DT. 12-12-2019 by cancelling the allotment made to the petitioner by forfeiting the ElVID paid with the application and further directing that the amount deposited shall be refunded as per Allotment Regulations without considering the representations of the petitioner dt. 17-05-2019, 27- 08-2019 and 11-09-2019 as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of the principles of natural j.,.stice and contrary to the letter and spirit of the Regulations framed by the 1st respondent and also violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and consequentially set aside the impugned proceedings dt. 12-12-2019 issued by the 2nd respondent, B.)declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent vide Lr. No. 22755/APHC/M IP/MALLAVALLIA/JA/2018/P. NO. 18/94 and 18/95, DT. 12- 12-2019 by cancelling the allotment made to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the article 14 and 19 of the constitution of the India and consequentially direct the respondents to execute and register the sale agreement in favour of the petitioner by complying the terms and conditions of the Allotment order lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend proceedings vide Lr. 22755/APIIC/M IP/MALLAVALLINJA/2018/P. NO. 18/94 and 18/95, DT. 12-12-2019 issued by 2nd respondent pending final disposal of the above writ Petition No. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order dated 07.01.2020 passed in W.P No. 15 of 2020 and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above said W.P. NO. 15 of 2020 by listing the above said case in the near date cause list under the caption of “For Withdrawal” in the interest of justice Ml. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KARUTURI HEMA BINDHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) 2.J UGRANARASIMHA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The petitioner filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the main writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed and Writ Petition No.15 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to M/s. Karuturi Hema Bindhu 2. Two CCs to GP for Industries & Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri J Ugranarasimha, 4. Two CD Copies TF (gsg) Advocate [OPUC] Commerce, High Court of Andhra Advocate [OPUC] HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 15 OF 2020 I juuiara ° ^ Current Seciior m;# O DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS