RAKHILA BIBI AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/977/2025 · 2025-04-28
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3116 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3116 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 977/2025 CM No. 2343/2025
1. Rakhila Bibi, Age 19 years, D/o Irshad, R/o Plakh, Tehsil Basohli, District Kathua.
2. Altaf Hussain, Age 20 years, S/o Rashid Ahmed, R/o Poonda, Tehsil Mahanpur, District Kathua.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Waseem Nissar, Advocate. Vs
1. UT of Jammu and Kashmir Through Commissioner/Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Civil Secretariat, Jammu.
2. Superintendent of Police, Kathua.
3. Station House Officer, Basohli, District Kathua.
4. Irshad, S/o Mohd. Ibrahim, R/o Ward No. 3, Chaka (Plakh), Tehsil Basohli, District Kathua.
5. Mohd. Zabar, S/o Mohd. Ibrahim, R/o Ward No. 4, Village Chaka (Plakh), Tehsil Basohli, District Kathua.
6. Mohd. Yousaf, S/o Mohd. Ibrahim, R/o Chaka, Tehsil Basohli, District Kathua.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (28.04.2025)
1. The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families. 2. To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a notarized marriage agreement dated
21.01.2025. Serial No. 23
2 WP(C) No. 977/2025
3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner no. 1’s Certificate of Birth evidencing her date of birth is also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioner no. 1 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner no. 2. 4. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 who are said to be carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other. 5. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law. 6. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set
3 WP(C) No. 977/2025
into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb. 7. This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2- Superintendent of Police, Kathua to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent no. 3- Station House Officer, Basohli, District Kathua that the petitioners, namely Rakhila Bibi and Altaf Hussain are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the respondents No. 4 to 6 or any other person acting at the behest and/or on behalf of the respondents No. 4 to 6. Furthermore, in case the Police Station, Basohli, District Kathua has registered any FIR at the instance of either of the respondents Nos. 4 to 6 against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out by the Police Station, Basohli, District Kathua in connection with investigation of the case. 8.
Disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
28.04.2025
Shivalee