APHC010451802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23233/2025 Between: 1. DEVARAJU TADIVALASA, S/O MUNIRATNAM, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 6-93-2, PRASAD NAGAR, KOTHAPET VILLAGE, VETAPALEM, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 5. THE CHIRALA MUNIPALITY, REP BY COMMISSIONER, CHIRALA. 6. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 8. BURLA VENKATA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O PITTUVARIPALEM PANCHAYAT, CHIRALA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the illegal interference of the respondents at the instance of 8th respondent herein in respect of petitioners rented property vide Ground plus four floors built in an extent of 379 Square Yards, situated at Dr No. 9-1-80, Old Municipal 6th ward, Church compound area, TS No. 337, Perala, S.No. 322/A, Beside Suresh Mahal, Chirala Municipality, Bapatla District, despite civil court pending vide O.S.No. 62 of 2025 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge at Chirala, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct all the official respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri B.V.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri P.Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. However, it does not preclude the Police to proceed with the case, if any, registered either against the Petitioner or the unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23233 of 2025 Dt.01.09.2025 Dinesh