Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3115 (RAJ)

RAHUL NANDA S/O VIRENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/413/2025 · 2025-01-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 413/2025 Rahul Nanda S/o Virendra Kumar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o House No. L-111, Sethi Colony, Transport Nagar, Ps Transport Nagar, Dist. Jaipur East. (Accused Petitioner Presently In Central Jail Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi, Ms. Renu Kunwar Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.394/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Jaipur, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 305(b) & 307 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other similar placed co-accused Aftab has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and no recovery of any money was effected at the instance of the present accused- petitioner. It is alleged in the FIR that some unknown persons caused mischief by breaking the motorcycles, tempo, auto etc., The matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the accused- [2025:RJ-JP:1483] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-413/2025] petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rahul Nanda S/o Virendra Kumar in connection with FIR No.394/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Jaipur, District Jaipur West shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/93