DR. GARIMA SAGAR WIFE OF DR RAHUL CHANDREL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14793/2025 · 2025-09-20
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31149 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31149 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14793/2025 Dr. Garima Sagar Wife Of Dr Rahul Chandrel, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 3A, Bhagwati Nagar-Ii, Kartarpura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Unviersity Of Health Sciences, Through Registrar, Sector 18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
3. Principal And Controller, S.m.s. Medical College And Controller Of The Attached Hospitals, Jaipur.
4. Additional Principal (Acad.) Office Of The Principal, S.m.s. Medical College And Controller Of The Attached Hospitals Jaipur.
5. Head Of Department, Obstetrics And Gynecology, S.m.s. Medical College, Jaipur.
6. Controller Of Examinations, Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Sector 18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chobisa For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 20/09/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that controversy akin to the instant matter is already taken into
consideration by this Court vide judgment dated 19.11.2024 in Dr. Ranjana Yadav Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.: SBCWP No.
[2025:RJ-JP:38791] (2 of 2) [CW-14793/2025] 12621/2024. Therefore, it is submitted that instant matter can be adjudicated in light of the dictum encapsulated in Dr. Ranjana Yadav (supra). Considering the forgoing facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it apposite to decide the present matter in light of Dr. Ranjana Yadav (supra). The contents of the above-cited judgment be treated as part and parcel of the present order. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /142