[2025:RJ-JP:26792] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 335/2025 1. Santara Devi Yadav W/o Shri Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Plot No. 1646, Niwai Mahant Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur (Raj) 2. Suresh Chand Yadav S/o Late Shri Ghanshyam Das Yadav, R/o Plot No. 1646, Niwai Mahant Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur (Raj) 3. Yaduveer Yadav S/o Shri Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Plot No. 1646, Niwai Mahant Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur (Raj) ----Appellants Versus 1. Gaurav Yadav S/o Shri Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o C-59-A, Shivad Area, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Govind Singh Yadav S/o Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 81, Shiv Nagar, Ramnagariya, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Arvind Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Plot No. 1646, Niwai Mahant Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Aruna Yadav, W/o Shri Kalluram Yadav Alias Kamal Yadav D/o Late Shri Mohanlal Yadav, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 179, Shyam Vihar Vistar, Behind Heerapura Power House, Saint Thomas School, Dhabas, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Sunita Yadav W/o Late Pawan Kumar D/o Late Shri Mohanlal Yadav, Aged About 40 Years, R/o B-93, Khatiko Ki Mandi, Laxminarayanpuri, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Pooran Singh Yadav S/o Late Shri Ramesh Chand Yadav, Aged About 46 Years, R/o D-189-A , Behind Kanodiya College Mangal Marg Ki Samapti Par, Bapu Ngar, Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Hemlata Yadav W/o Shri Bhawani Shankar D/o Late Shri Ramesh Chand Yadav, Aged About 49 Years, R/o D-69-A, [2025:RJ-JP:26792] (2 of 3) [CMA-335/2025] Paras Marg, Shivad Area, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 8. Beena Yadav W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Yadav, Aged About 63 Years, R/o F-90, Chaitanya Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 9. Nagar Nigam Grater Jaipur, Through Commissioner Address Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mishra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/07/2025 1. An application No.215/2025 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed by the applicants/appellants for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. The appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order dated 18.10.2023, passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan-I in Civil Misc. Case No.33/2021 (222/2021), whereby the temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff-respondent was allowed. 3. This appeal has been preferred with a delay of three hundred fifty six days. 4. On perusal of the averments made in the application No.215/2025 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay, this Court finds that no sufficient reason has been shown for delay in filing the appeal, therefore, application No.215/2025 is dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:26792] (3 of 3) [CMA-335/2025] 5. As a result of dismissal of the application No.215/2025 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the present appeal is also dismissed being time barred. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /33