[2025:RJ-JP:39745] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12333/2025 Ramchandra S/o Shri Jesaram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Dhani Bijarniyo Ki, Katrathal Road, Piprali, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar, At Assistant Account Officer-First, Office Of Additional District Project Coordinator, Comprehensive Education, Sikar, Rajasthan. (Accused In Central Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripudaman Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 26/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.209/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 7A & 12 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that false recovery of bribe amount of Rs.40,000/- has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel submits that co-accused Kamal Kumar has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. Petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2025 & trial [2025:RJ-JP:39745] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12333/2025] of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that co-accused Kamal Kumar has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Ramchandra S/o Shri Jesaram shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /71