Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31119 (KAR)

SMT GAYATHRI CHANDRASHEKAR v. SRI LOKANATHA RAO

MFA/8488/2017 · 2025-03-26

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12730 MFA No. 8488 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8488 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. GAYATHRI CHANDRASHEKAR, WIFE OF SRI. S. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.422, 9TH "A" MAIN ROAD, H.R.B.R. 1ST STAGE, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 043. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. LOKANATHA RAO, SON OF VENKOBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT: NO.19, 7TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 052. ADDRESS MENTIONED IN THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION, NO.33, HOUSE LIST NO.33, V.P.KATHA NO.76/1, RACHENAHALLI, BEHIND GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12730 MFA No. 8488 of 2017 ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 076. 2. SMT. MARY, WIFE OF ILANGOVAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI, THANISANDRA ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045. …RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 24.02.2020, APPEAL AGAINST R2 IS DISMISSED) ******** THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.02.2017 PASSED ON MISC.NO.132/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORING IT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12730 MFA No. 8488 of 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter is settled between the parties out of Court. Therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. 2. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record. 3. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 CT: BHK