NIRANJAN PRAMANIK AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/16019/2024 · 2025-08-06
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31119 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31119 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
M/L 702 06.08.2025 Bpg. ct.no.35
W.P.A.16019 of 2024
Niranjan Pramanik & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Juin Dutta Chakraborty Mr. Bidan Modak Ms. Arpita Kundu. …for the petitioners.
Mr. Amal Kr. Sen Mr. Lal Mohan Basu. …for the State-respondents.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the dispute and difference between the petitioners and the private respondents have been resolved, as such, further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted. Learned advocate for the State is present. Since the dispute and difference has been resolved, I am of the view that further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted. Accordingly, WPA 16019 of 2024 is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
2 All parties shall act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copies of this
order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)