Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31114 (CHH)

Rakesh Roshan Lahre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/5993/2016 · 2025-06-16

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24967 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5993 of 2016 1. Rakesh Roshan Lahre S/o Shri Vishnu Lal Lahre, Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No.1, Killapara, Dongargaon, Tahsil And Police Station Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chintamani Dubey, S/o Shri Ram Garib Dubey, Aged About 40 Years R/o Near P.T.S. Center, Mandir Road, House Of Jitendra Mishra, Ward No. 19, Tahsil, Police Station And Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Bal Mukund @ Mukund Ram Patel, S/o Nandu Ram Patel, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Sakripar, Post Rudragaon, Tahsil And Police Station Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health Services, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Office Of Directorate, Health Services, Indravati Bhavan, P.S. Rakhi, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Office Of C.M.O. Health, Old Hospital, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4. District Malaria Officer, Office Of District Malaria Officer, Old Hospital, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5. District Malaria Officer, Office Of District Malaria Officer, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, P.L. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17.06 .2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that service of the petitioners has been terminated by order dated dated 01/08/2015 (Annexure P/11) pursuant to which they have filed representation for taking them back to service but that has not been considered. 3. Be that as it may, petitioners are directed to file fresh representation within 2 weeks from today which will be considered by respondents No. 2 and 3 in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 3 4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet