IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.536 of 2025 ------ 1. Prince Ram @ Prince Kumar, aged about 18 years son of Ravindra Ram, 2. Manish Kumar aged about 22 years son of Ravindra Ram, 3. Ravindra Ram @ Ravindra Ram Gupta, aged about 53 years son of Gopi Chandra Ram. 4. Rita Devi aged about 40 years wife of Ravindra Ram. All are the residents of Vill-Loyabad Sendra More, Left side, P.O. & P.S.-Loyabad, Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Suman Saurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27/01/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Loyabad P.S. Case No.08 of 2024 instituted under Sections 323, 341, 354, 354D, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, outraged the modesty of the informant and used criminal force to disrobe her and caused hurt to her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner no.1 is a boy of 18 years and the petitioner no.3 and 4 are respectively the father and mother of the petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2 is the elder brother of the petitioner no.1. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-13 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner and will not go to near the house of the informant during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within eight weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-cum-Addl. C.J. (Jr. Div), Dhanbad in connection with Loyabad P.S. Case No.08 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner and will not go to near the house of the informant during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/