- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1764 WP No. 22237 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 22237 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI K.V.NAIDU S/O K.C.NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 4TH CROSS, GOWDARA COLONY, 1ST MAIN ROAD, R.M.V. 2ND STAGE, DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU-560 094. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.N.NANJA REDDY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NORTH DIVISION, SRI. C.V.RAMAN ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU-560 022. 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANJAYNAGAR POLICE STATION, SANJAYNAGAR MAIN ROAD, CIL LAYOUT A BLOCK, JUDICIAL COLONY, RAJMAHAL VILAS, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 094. 3. M/S. MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED, HAVING ITS OFFICE MUTHOOT CENTRE, T C NO.27/3022, PUNNEN ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1764 WP No. 22237 of 2021 TRIVENDRUM, KERALA-695 034. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, AND REGIONAL MANAGER, SRI. THOMAS. 4. MR. W.F.MOSES ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT, MUTHOOT FINCORP, MUTHOOT CENTRE. TC NO.27/3022, PUNNEN ROAD, THRIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA-695 001. 5. MR.THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT MANAGING DIRECTOR, TC NO.27/3022, PUNNEN ROAD, THRIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA-695 001. 6. MR.VIKRAM AMPALAKAT DIRECTOR, MUTHOOT FINCORP, MUTHOOT CENTRE, TC NO.27/3022, PUNNEN ROAD, THRIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA-695 001. 7. MR. ANOOP GUPTA DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED HOME SOLUTIONS PVT LTD., NO.501/502, BUILDING, NO.2, A WING, PARK SITE, KAILAS INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, VIKHROLI-WEST, MUMBAI - 400 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., HCGP FOR R1 & 2; SRI. N.SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3; SRI. A.S.VISHWAJITH., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO 6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1764 WP No. 22237 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.P.N.Nanja Reddy., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Srinivas Kumar.M., HCGP for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Nanja Reddy.P.N., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 25