Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31108 (HP)

AKSHAY DHIMAN v. THE HPSEBL AND ANOTHER

CWP/16328/2025 · 2025-10-16

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16328 of 2025 Decided on: 16th October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Akshay Dhiman …..Petitioner Versus HPSEB Limited and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana Misra, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner is serving as T-Mate at Electrical Sub- Division Sach under Electrical Division Killar, District Chamba. It is his case that on completion of prescribed normal tenure at the aforesaid hard and tribal area, he 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 preferred a representation through his learned counsel on 20.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) to the respondents, seeking transfer to a station of his preference, but the aforesaid representation has not been decided by the competent authority till date. 4. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 20.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy, within a period of three weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 16, 2025 Judge Mukesh