$~23 and 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 309/2024, CM APPL. 64443/2024-Stay OM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: None. versus RAVI GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Alankar Tewari, Adv. (through VC) 24 + RC.REV. 310/2024, CM APPL. 64488/2024-Stay TRIBHUVAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: None. versus RAVI GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Alankar Tewari, Adv. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 15.09.2025 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner(s). 2. Mr. Alankar Tewari, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent submits he has already filed his Vakalatnama, which is on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent reiterates his submissions made on 14.08.2025 that since the petitioners/ landlords has already taken This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:24:56 possession of the subject premises, the present petitions have become infructuous. 4. As such, as also considering the dicta of Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.C. Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana [2003 (1) SCC 453 and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma & Anr. [Civil Appeal Nos.5220- 5221 of 2008 order dated 19.08.2008], the present petitions are per se not maintainable. 5. In view of the above, the present petition(s) alongwith the pending applications having rendered infructuous stands disposed of. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2025/bh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:24:56