PARMANAND ALIAS PANDA S/O CHITARLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12309/2025 · 2025-09-25
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31100 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31100 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39802] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12309/2025 Parmanand Alias Panda S/o Chitarlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla Jhalrapatan, Police Station Jharlapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 25/09/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Parmanand Alias Panda S/o Chitarlal, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.288/2025 Dated 07.09.2025 registered at P.S. Jhalra Patan District – Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 8, 22 and 29 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time.
[2025:RJ-JP:39802] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-12309/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for applicant submits that without following the mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act, the police has conducted search and seizure. He also submitted that police has not called any independent witness before effect search of petitioner accused. He further submits that police has allegedly recover 7.7 gram of MDMA from the petitioner accused and same is less than commercial quantity. He also submits that total nine cases were shown against the petitioner accused and out of which six relating to Section 13 of RPGO. He also submits that two cases relating to IPC were
disposed of and in ninth case FIR No.322/2022, the recovered quantity is 100 gram Ganja which is less than small quantity. He further submits that except current case, the petitioner accused is not in custody in any other matter. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 07.09.2025, Harlal Meena, SHO, PS Jhalra Patan has intercepted the petitioner accused in suspicious condition and on search recovered 7.7 gram MDMA from possession of the petitioner accused. The petitioner accused was arrested on 07.09.2025 and he is in custody. The criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused indicate that six cases were registered under Section 13 of RPGO and out of which one is disposed of. Two cases were registered under
[2025:RJ-JP:39802] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-12309/2025] IPC and same are disposed of as per statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. The FIR No.322/2022 under Section 8/20 NDPS Act is registered against the petitioner accused on 27.09.2022 for allegedly possessing 100 grams of Ganja, which is small quantity. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Parmanand Alias Panda S/o Chitarlal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall mark his attendance on every first and third Monday of every month at Police Station Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar, till disposal of the case pending before the trial Court. (iii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
[2025:RJ-JP:39802] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-12309/2025] (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/178