Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3110 (ALL)

ARSHAD ALI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA528/49144/2025 · 2026-05-04

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 49144 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Ashok Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Kavindra Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Chetan Chatterjee, learned Standing Counsel for the power corporation and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 923 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 633 of 2021, under Sections 135 of Electricity Act, Police Station- Antipower Tehft, District- Ballia, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 14.07.2025 pending in the Court of Special Judge (E.C. Act)/ Additional Session Judge, Ballia. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction/ authority. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. May 5, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Chetan Chatterjee, G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Arshad Ali And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad